Fraser second from right<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nFraser also advocated for the Jewish people in San Francisco, declaring:<\/p>\n
Whatever can be done to help the persecuted Jewish people shall and must be done to the utmost ability of all right-thinking men. There should be no antagonism or misunderstanding between the Jewish and Arab peoples, as everyone living in Palestine would naturally benefit from what the Jewish people have made out of a land which was once desert, until the desert bloomed as a rose. Palestine is very akin to the ideals of New Zealand except that the Jewish people went into Palestine with a tradition of privation\u2026 ..I hope and believe that the representatives from this country who take part in the council will stand four-square for justice for the ancient home and new hope of the Jewish people.\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nFraser saw the UN Partition Plan of 1947 as a fair solution which \u2018involved the least injustice to the rights of both parties\u2019. He stated that if the Palestinian Arabs were to set up a government within the territory allocated to the Arab State by the General Assembly, NZ would be equally willing to recognise it. However, under no circumstances, would he recognise or accept the right of the Arabs to proclaim a unitary Arab state throughout the whole of Palestine, as such an action would be in flagrant contravention of the General Assembly resolution.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nFraser was keen to recognise Israel immediately upon its May 1948 declaration of statehood but came under sustained pressure from Britain not to do so. As a member of the commonwealth, New Zealand sought to act in concert with other members. New Zealand had taken an independent path on the 1947 vote, believing that partitioning the land and offering a state for the Jews and a state for the Arabs was the fairest solution. Fraser was then persuaded by Britain to hold off recognition of the state of Israel, while any likelihood of \u2018persuading the Arabs to agree to a truce remained\u2019.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nFraser was disturbed by the British government’s attitude; alarmed that Britain continued to supply munitions to the Arabs and at the involvement of British officers in the Transjordan Arab Legion.<\/p>\n
Fraser also had to contend with his own cabinet who voted to follow Britain\u2019s lead. Fraser and Walter Nash were the only two that voted to proceed with recognition.\u00a0 <\/span>All others voted against the motion. This was the occasion on which Alister McIntosh, felt the need to constrain the Prime Minister\u2019s \u201cZionist exuberance.\u201d<\/p>\nNew Zealand accorded de facto<\/i> recognition to Israel simultaneously with the United Kingdom on 29 January 1949. In May 1949 the United Nations General Assembly voted to grant Israel UN membership. New Zealand supported the resolution along with thirty-seven other countries and finally accorded de jure <\/i>recognition to Israel on 28 July 1950, along with Britain.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPeter Fraser steered his nation through the difficult years 1940-1949. While he didn\u2019t gain the public affection won by Michael Joseph Savage, he was an astute, gifted politician, who put the needs of the nation above the party. He was greatly loved by the Jewish community who afforded him the great honour of inscribing his name in the Golden Book. They viewed Fraser in the same light as previous Zionist leaders who had contributed significantly to the establishment of the Jewish state; Arthur Balfour, Lloyd George, Jans Smuts and Winston Churchill.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPeter Fraser stands as an example of a man driven by principles of justice and human rights, willing to go \u2018against the tide\u2019 for what he believed was right. He demonstrates the power of the individual to influence the destiny of nations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
First published on Times of Israel On Yom Ha\u2019atzmaut, Israel\u2019s Independence Day, Sheree Trotter reflects on New Zealand\u2019s role in the establishment of the state of Israel.\u00a0 In 1948 NZ Prime Minister Peter Fraser was criticised for his \u2018Zionist exuberance\u2019 by one of his most senior officials, at a time when the NZ government was […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":4902,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[450,35,34,447,451],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4890"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4890"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4890\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4909,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4890\/revisions\/4909"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4902"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/israelinstitute.nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}